Brian Barr stands shoulder to shoulder with its client in defending and defeating a positive case of fundamental dishonesty brought against him

This case study was written thanks to the expertise of our team, including Alex Cohen, Philip Cohen, and Steven Akerman, leading experts in compensation claims for chronic pain and serious injury.

Chronic Primary Pain is, by definition, an invisible condition, incapable of independent verification on scan or x-ray. It is the perpetuation of pain beyond the period when soft tissue injury normally heals, explicable by the interaction of the ‘biopsychosocial model’ of medicine.

It is a daunting and lonely condition to suffer, made worse by people, often clinicians and frequently paying parties such as insurers, expressing scepticism as to whether the condition exists at all, or is as debilitating as the sufferer contends.

This area of medical jurisprudence results in paying parties deploying the statutory strikeout ‘fundamental dishonesty defence’ in chronic pain litigation more than in any other field of injury litigation. Such allegations are often alleged on the flimsiest of material, either on the basis of evidence from doctors with little insight or training into the science of chronic pain, and/or on excerpts of edited surveillance that fails to capture the variability of function that chronic pain survivors experience.

Most chronic pain survivors struggle with achieving restorative sleep. They spend most of the time feeling physically and mentally exhausted, low in mood and generally demoralised. They are especially vulnerable to the additional psychological burden of having accusations of dishonesty made against them by the parties that caused their original injuries, in the knowledge that financial ruin awaits them if those allegations succeed trial; occasionally, they face also the prospect of criminal sanctions from committal proceedings for contempt of court that occasionally follow on from fundamental dishonesty findings.

The proliferation of the fundamental dishonesty strikeout defence since it came into force in 2015 has become a major challenge for all injury practitioners, because this large cohort of deserving and vulnerable chronic pain claimants require fearless and sympathetic representation.

One such example was the recent case of Mr Taylor who sustained a shoulder injury after being knocked off his bicycle by a driver. He continued to complain of ongoing symptoms that prevented him from returning to his full duties as an electrician and resulted in him becoming incapable of all work after the 13th month anniversary of the accident.

The driver’s insurer defended the claim on the basis that Mr Taylor was fundamentally dishonest and was fabricating his entire presentation of disability to his family, friends, employer, and the Court, from the six week anniversary of the accident. Six years later, his case proceeded to trial over seven days in the Central London County Court in February 2022.

Mr Taylor was subject to 23 days of covert surveillance, none of which demonstrated him doing more than he said he could do in a detailed statement disclosed before the surveillance. He was subjected to rigorous cross-examination, as were his family, friends and former employer. Their evidence stood up to scrutiny.

The defendant’s lead expert, a shoulder surgeon, was subjected to rigorous scrutiny in cross-examination on the fourth day of the trial following which the case settled on the morning of the fifth day of the trial for an undisclosed sum, protected by a confidentiality agreement with the defendant, who withdrew its allegation of fundamental dishonesty in open court.

What Mr Taylor’s case illustrates is that it requires enormous attention to detail and courage to stand up to insurers who deploy fundamental dishonesty defences. When appropriate, insurers must be called out on those defences and challenged in Court to substantiate them.

Brian Barr Solicitors takes pride in representing its clients fearlessly in the face of aggression from the insurance industry, as demonstrated in Mr Taylor’s case.

To learn more about our success stories, and get the legal support of leading specialists in the field, call us on 0161 737 9248.

Share:

Find out if you have a claim

Latest Articles

Fibromyalgia, CRPS, FND and Chronic Pain: understanding the mental and physical impact
Fibromyalgia, chronic pain and CRPS sufferers – tips for wellness during National Stress Awareness Month
Understanding the link between Fibromyalgia, CRPS, Chronic Pain, and stress
Brian Barr Solicitors secures £410,000 settlement for maintenance worker involved in accident at work
The connection between mental health and fibromyalgia and the implications in personal injury claims
The significance of medical records in personal injury cases
The impact of social media on personal injury claims
How long do you have to make a claim for compensation?
Successful resolution in road traffic accident for existing fibromyalgia sufferer
What made this case particularly complicated was our client's pre-existing history of fibromyalgia.
Brian Barr Solicitors take on CRPS case and settle for £650,000 more than initial estimate
Brian Barr settles CRPS case for £650,000 more than estimate from previous solicitors
What factors determine the value of your personal injury claim?
The changing seasons – how Autumn impacts fibromyalgia, FND, and chronic pain sufferers